Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Womack

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1982No. 388PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, Judge:

On July 18, 1980, appellant, Robert Womack, was found guilty of Rape1 and Criminal Conspiracy.2 Following the jury’s verdict, appellant’s trial counsel failed to file post-verdict motions pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 1123.3 Instead, counsel attempted to file post-trial motions nunc pro tunc on January 26, 1981, the date of sentencing. The trial judge *401denied the request,4 and imposed sentence. Shortly thereafter, appellant filed a pro se Notice of Appeal to this court.5

Appellant raises the following contentions for our review: (1) The trial court committed reversible error by…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. DancerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SinclairSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. BowserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. FullerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. BrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API