Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bright

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 24, 1987No. 765PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence for robbery, burglary, criminal conspiracy and possessing instruments of a crime. A previous appeal, filed on October 29, 1983, was never briefed and as a result, this Court dismissed the appeal without prejudice to appellant’s rights under the Post Conviction Hearing Act. Following the filing of a PCHA petition, Bright’s right to appeal was reinstated nunc pro tunc.

Appellant’s first contention is that his trial counsel was ineffective in 1) failing to object to irrelevant testimony, 2) failing to object to an erroneous jury…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PoundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. ClemmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. McNeilSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Martin v. SoblotneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Aplt v. Kingston, S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Commonwealth v. SaundersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. WeinderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. CarterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. DormanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API