Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Harrah

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Umatilla County. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLord, C. J.

The plaintiffs, being in business in Pendleton, through their agents, doing business at Walla Walla, sold and delivered to the defendant a machine for the sum of @275, for which the defendant promised and agreed to execute two notes, payable at different dates, and furnish such surety or indorsers thereon as would be satisfactory to the plaintiffs. With this understanding, the defendant executed his individual notes, payable to the plaintiffs, which were received by their agents and forwarded to them with an explanation of the arrangement. The plaintiffs received the notes, and on several…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hanna v. MillsNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  2. Yale v. CoddingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  3. Rice v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860
  4. Scott v. MontagueSupreme Court of Vermont · 1844
  5. Hale v. JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1876

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Precision Development Co. v. Fast Bearing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  2. Pasha v. BohartMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Grant v. WarrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  4. Messenger v. WogeColorado Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Messenger v. WogeColorado Court of Appeals · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API