Legal Opinion

Armstead v. Miller

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Decided January 28, 1971Published

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, J.,

— Walter W. Arm-stead, doing business and trading as Consulting Service and Consulting Service Enterprises, Inc., a corporation, instituted an action against Fay Miller to restrain defendant for six months following a final court order, from directly or indirectly engaging in the employment agency business except on behalf of plaintiffs as provided in a written contract. Defendant contends she had no contract of employment with Consultant Service Enterprises, Inc.

The contract was made personally with Walter W. Armstead. Walter W. Armstead could not legally assign the contract to…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. MartucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Belmont Laboratories, Inc. v. HeistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Unit Vending Corp. v. LacasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Macbeth-Evans Glass Co. v. SchnelbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. United Refining Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API