Legal Opinion

Tabatha Manning v. Vaughn Cotton

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 5, 2017No. 16-3076PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAM, Circuit Judge.

Tabatha Manning sued Vaughn Cotton and Theodore Delezene, both police officers for the City of Omaha (“Officers”), and the City of Omaha (collectively “Defendants”) following her arrest for possession of methamphetamine. Manning filed a civil rights action against the Officers for violating her Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights, and against the City under a theory of municipal liability. The district court 1 denied qualified immunity for the Officers and denied the City of Omaha’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Cecelia Webb v. City of MaplewoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  2. David Ivey v. Audrain County, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  3. Dustin Burnikel v. Michael FongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  4. Fred Watson v. Eddie Boyd, IIICourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  5. Hal Stanley v. Katherine FinneganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API