Legal Opinion
Scarborough v. Novak
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 12, 1955No. 35750, 35755PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.
As the petition and answer stood after sustaining the. demurrers, the answer admitted the factual transaction set out in the petition—that is, that the broker obtained the $1,000 sought to be recovered by the plaintiff, who was the purchaser in the contract of sale; that the subject matter of the contract was 428-450 McDonough Blvd., S. E., Atlanta; that the contract contained the provision that the $1,000 earnest money was to be applied by the broker to commissions “at the consummation of this sale”; that the sale was not consummated; that the contract, also contained a provision “buyer…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- F & C INVESTMENT COMPANY v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- Wehunt v. PritchettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Stanaland v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Williams v. GottliebCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Scottish Union & National Insurance v. Peoples Credit Clothing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dell v. KugelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Scott v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Parker v. AverettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Bonner v. JordanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Homler v. MalasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.