Legal Opinion

Genovay v. Fox

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 17, 1959PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cxjeiam.

In this rather unusual case the Appellate Division held that the issue of defendant’s negligence should have been submitted to the jury for determination. Consequently, it reversed the action of the trial court in granting the motion for judgment for the defendant after all of the evidence had been submitted. 50 N. J. Super. 538 (App. Div. 1958). We granted certification.

At the oral argument the parties were in agreement that the legal question to be decided is whether the evidence and the inferences therefrom are susceptible of the conclusion that during the holdup defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Genovay v. FoxNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Butler v. Acme Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Clohesy v. Food Circus Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  3. Trentacost v. BrusselSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. Boyd v. Racine Currency Exchange, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Kentucky Fried Chicken of California, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API