Giles County v. Rainey
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gailor
This case rises under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, and specifically Code Sec. 6871, as said section was amended by Chapter 149, Public Acts of 1945. The case is improperly styled. The parties are reversed.
Roy Rainey, a former employee of Giles County, filed his bill in the Chancery Court of that County for compen*241sation for permanent total disability. Giles Comity and other County officials were made parties defendant, as was W. N. Estes, Treasurer of the State of Tennessee, as custodian of the “Second Injury Fund” set up under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Chapter 149, Public Acts of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson Coffee Co. v. McDonaldTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
- Partee v. Memphis Concrete Pipe Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- Leonard v. Cranberry Furnace Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1924
- Maxwell v. BeckTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
- Cherokee Brick Co. v. BishopTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Clendening v. London Assurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1960
- Murray Ohio Manufacturing Co. v. YarberTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
- Green v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1965
- Injury Fund St. Tx. v. ConradCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Clendening v. London Assurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.