Legal Opinion · Dissent
Winslow v. . R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 3, 1909PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1DissentClark, C. J.
This action is to recover the sum of $201, the alleged value of a mule, killed while being transported from Kansas City by defendant. From the judgment rendered the plaintiff appealed.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. The only assignment of error is to the ruling of his Honor holding the plaintiffs to the value of $100 agreed upon in the bill of lading under which the live stock were shipped.
The bill of lading set out in the record is identical in all respects with the one printed in full in Jones against this same carrier (251) (148 N.C. 583), and the point was fully…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Express Co. v. CaldwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- South & North Alabama Railroad v. HenleinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- South & North Alabama Railroad v. Henlein & BarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Western Railway Co. v. HarwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Washington Horse Exchange v. L. & N. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- J. M. Pace Mule Co. v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Breeding Assn. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Horse Exchange v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Harden v. Chesapeake & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.