Legal Opinion

Horse Exchange v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 23, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff sued to recover damages for injuries to horses and mules shipped by it from East St. Louis, in the State of Illinois, to Washington, N.C. over the defendant's line of railway, the Norfolk Southern Railroad, and the lines of intermediate carriers. There were two shipments. One, consisting of twenty-six horses and twenty-six mules, was made on 2 January, 1912, and the other, consisting of twenty-two horses and four mules, on 18 January, 1912. Plaintiff alleged that some of the animals were either killed or missing, and others seriously injured and damaged by the negligence of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Selby v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  4. Gardner v. Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  5. Merchants & Miners' Transportation Co. v. EichbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. King v. HigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API