Peterson Hunting v. Labor Commission
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McHUGH, Presiding Judge:
{1 Kurtley Peterson, doing business as Peterson Hunting, petitions for review of the Labor Commission's (the Commission) determination that he is not exempt from compliance with the Workers' Compensation Act as an agricultural employer. 1 See Utah Code Ann. §§ 34A-2-101 to -1005 (2011) (Workers' Compensation Act); id. § 34A-2-108(5) (providing an exemption from the Workers' Compensation Act for agricultural employers). 2 According to Peterson, he is an agricultural employer because he uses agricultural labor in the form of feeding, harvesting, and managing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Grace Drilling Co. v. Board of ReviewCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Martinez v. Media-Paymaster Plus/Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- Esquivel v. Labor Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- United Park City Mines Co. v. Stichting Mayflower Mountain FondsUtah Supreme Court · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Murray v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- CR England v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
- Clawson v. Labor Commission, Division of AdjudicationCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013