Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Scanlon

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 10, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Richardson

Affirming.

Albert J. Scanlon, on December 14, 1932, was in the employment of the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company when he suffered a fall as the result of which he claims his hearing in one ear became, affected. He was sick for three days, then returned to work, and shortly thereafter was discharged. He employed attorneys to represent him in the presentation of his claim for compensation, on account of his injury. One of them wrote a letter to the A. & P. Company demanding the payment of compensation, which resulted in a conference of Scanlon and his…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gelpcke v. DubuqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  2. Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Douglass v. County of PikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Oliver Co. v. Louisville Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  5. Scott Tobacco Co. v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. WT Sistrunk & Co. v. KellsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986
  2. Russo v. Leckie Collieries Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  3. Pohlman v. Owensboro National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
  4. Shaffer v. Wolfe CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API