Johnson v. Seidel
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 2, Jan. T., 1892, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Northumberland Co., Sept. T., 1889, No. 368, on verdict for defendant. Assumpsit for services in procuring purchaser of real estate. The facts as they appeared on the trial before Rockefeller, P. J., are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
We fail to find error, either in the rejection of evidence, or the charge of the court. The eleventh specification alleges that the court below erred in giving the jury a binding instruction to find a verdict in favor of the defendant. This would have been error had there been anything to submit, but the learned judge was of the opinion that there was not sufficient *397evidence that the plaintiff had procured a purchaser for the defendant’s property. John T. Ritter, the purchaser, testified that he never knew Mr. Johnson, the plaintiff, in the transaction, and that he was not in any…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Ritch v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Barnes v. BeakleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Miller Cattle Co. v. ChambersArizona Supreme Court · 1930
- Griffith v. CowanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Bowers v. MillsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.