Legal Opinion

Stein, Inc. v. Tracy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1999No. 97-2520PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Stein first contends that purchases of the slag-a-ways, which transport molten slag and scrap from the steel companies’ plants to Stein’s reclamation area, and of related supplies are exempt under former R.C. 5739.02(B)(16). During the audit period in question,1 that statute provided exemptions for:

“Sales to persons engaged in manufacturing, processing, assembling, or refining, of handling and transportation equipment * * * used in intraplant or interplant transfers or shipments of tangible personal property in the process of production for sale by manufacturing, processing, assembling, or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. White Motor Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. General Motors Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  3. General Motors Corp. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bay Mechanical & Electrical Corp. v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Laurel Transportation, Inc. v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Bay Mechanical & Electrical Corp. v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Karvo Paving Co. v. TestaOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Laurel Transp., Inc. v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API