Legal Opinion

Laurel Transportation, Inc. v. Zaino

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 2001No. 00-1018PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

During August 1991, Laurel Transportation, Inc. (“Laurel”) purchased a 1987 Cessna Citation III (“Citation III”) for $5,300,000 by trading in a Beechcraft King Air and a Cessna Citation II with a combined value of $3,800,000, and by making a cash payment of $1,500,000. The Citation III was purchased out of state and brought into Ohio; however, Laurel paid no use tax, claiming in its unit certificate of exemption that it purchased the Citation III for resale.

Prior to the purchase of the Citation III, Laurel had entered into agreements with Mercury Aviation Company (“Mercury”) and Corporate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fliteways, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Stein, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. CAO Holdings, Inc. v. Loren L. Chumley, Commissioner of Revenue, State of TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
  2. CAO Holdings, Inc. v. Loren L. Chumley, Commissioner of Revenue, State of Tennessee - DissentingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
  3. Karvo Paving Co. v. TestaOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Laurel Transp., Inc. v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API