Legal Opinion
DEARDORFF v. CELLULAR SALES OF KNOXVILLE, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 25, 2020No. 2:19-cv-02642Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JESSICA DEARDORFF, et al., CIVIL ACTION Plaintiffs, NO. 19-2642-KSM v. CELLULAR SALES OF KNOXVILLE, INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM MARSTON, J. August 25, 2020 Plaintiffs Jessica Deardorff and David Chapman, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, filed this class action lawsuit against Defendants Cellular Sales of Knoxville, Inc. (CSOKI), Cellular Sales of Pennsylvania (CSPA), and Cellular Sales of North Carolina, LLC (CSNC), alleging that Defendants failed to pay them proper overtime…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Harold Pinker, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Roche Holdings Ltd. Harold PinkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- O'CONNOR v. Sandy Lane Hotel Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.