Henwood v. Wallace
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1DissentSibley, Circuit Judge
(dissentiug).
The district judge’s impression of his duty when an instructed verdict was moved was correct rather than that he acted on afterwards. There are two questions. First, was the general rule, well established in Louisiana, that one knowingly approaching a railroad crossing must stop (unless stopping is plainly unnecessary or imprudent), look and listen for the train,1 made more stringent by the general highway Act, No. 286, Acts of 1938, p. 726. Second, does the evidence under either rule require a finding that plaintiff fell short in diligence.
1. The Act of 1938, Title 2, Section 3,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lockhart v. Missouri Pac. R. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
- Pittman v. Gifford-Hill & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
- Louisiana & Arkansas Ry. Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
- Gibbons v. N. O. Terminal Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Illinois Cent. R. v. LeichnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.