Legal Opinion
Dorney v. Harris
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided January 15, 1980No. Civ. A. 79-K-980PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KANE, District Judge.
This complaint alleges that defendant, David W. Harris, M.D., negligently performed a surgical procedure known as a Frankenhauser nerve block. In her third claim for relief, plaintiff alleges that Dr. Harris’ conduct constituted a breach of implied and express warranties to perform proper care for plaintiff’s dysmenorrhea condition. Plaintiff’s fourth claim for relief requests this court to award punitive damages because defendant, in treating plaintiff, was guilty of wanton disregard of the possible effects of the treatment on plaintiff’s well…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Perlmutter v. Beth David HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Hiigel v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Carmichael v. ReitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- McRose v. BottyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Carlson v. McCoySupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jung Ja Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- In Re KeyworthDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1985
- Easterly v. HSP of Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- Williams v. Farmers Insurance Group, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1989
- Burns v. WannamakerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.