Legal Opinion
Roth v. Robertson
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 15, 1909PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Action for an accounting.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
This action is brought by the plaintiff in his own behalf and of other stockholders of the S. L. Robertson Amusement Company, to compel the defendant Samuel L. Robertson to account to the plaintiff and the amusement company for certain moneys alleged to have been received by *344him as manager of the company, and unaccounted for, or improperly or illegally expended by him.
The plaintiff’s evidence upon the trial was directed to some six different items, aggregating some $2,159.50, for which it is claimed the defendant should account.
I am of the opinion that the evidence touching all of these…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sage v. . CulverNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Hun v. . CaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Holmes v. . WillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Wormser v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Austin v. DanielsNew York Supreme Court · 1847
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Caremark International Inc. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1996
- In Re Leasing Consultants Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Pirrone v. Toboroff (In Re Vaniman International, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1982
- Russell P. Miller and Margaret Jane Miller, His Wife v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company (Hereafter At&t)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Hornstein v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.