Legal Opinion

Vogel v. Pittsburgh Public School District

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 21, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-01250-JFCPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CONTI, Chief Judge.

In this civil action, plaintiff Robert Vogel (“Vogel” or “plaintiff’), a former employee of the Pittsburgh Public School District (“PPSD” or the “District”), alleges that he was subjected to unlawful age-related discrimination and retaliation in connection with two adverse ratings which he received relative to the 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 school years. Because of his two consecutive adverse ratings, Vogel was unable to retain his teaching position with the District. He now seeks relief against PPSD under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kier v. F. Lackland & Sons, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API