Legal Opinion
Mishaga v. Schmitz
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided September 30, 2015No. 10-cv-03187PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, United States District Judge:
This cause is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Defendants Leo P. Schmitz1 and Michael W. *983Vorreyer, of the Illinois State Police, seek an order upholding the Illinois Firearm Owner Identification Act (“the FOID Act” or “the Act”), 430 ILCS 65/1 et seq:, as constitutional as applied to Plaintiff Ellen Mishaga, a nonresident of the State of Illinois. Mishaga seeks an order declaring the FOID Act unconstitutional as applied to her because it violates her rights under the Constitution’s Article IV and Second and…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smart Wearable Technologies Inc. v. Fitbit, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2017
- People v. WigginsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
- Gills v. HamiltonDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2024
- XYZ Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
- Yang v. Shenzhen Hongfangrui Technology Co., Ltd.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023