Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dethloff v. Dethloff

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1998No. Civil 970233Published

1DissentSandstrom, Justice

[¶ 26] Because the entry of default judgment as a sanction is too harsh under the circumstances of this ease, I would reverse the entry of default judgment and remand for consideration of a lesser sanction. I therefore dissent.

I

[¶ 27] Generally, William Dethloffs April 9, 1997, answer — even if late — would preclude the entry of a default judgment because it was filed prior to the entry of judgment. See Filler v. Bragg, 1997 ND 24, ¶ 11, 559 N.W.2d 225 (“By its very language, Rule 55 provides default judgment may not be obtained against a party who has appeared. If a party appears by motion…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vorachek v. Citizens State Bank of LankinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Filler v. BraggNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Bachmeier v. Wallwork Truck CentersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Dakota Bank & Trust Co. of Fargo v. BrakkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Rudh v. RudhNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API