Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Water World Water Slide, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 21, 1994No. 24030PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

Kim Hughes (“Plaintiff’) filed a summons and complaint and delivered these papers to the sheriff of Horry County for service. Service was effected on the president of Wet World, Inc. (“Defendant”) during the period provided under 3(b), SCRCP, but after the running of the statute of limitations. The original summons and complaint misnamed the Defendant. The trial judge dismissed the action as barred by the statute of limitations. We REVERSE.

PACTS

The Plaintiff, a police officer, was injured on August 12, 1988 when he fell in a hole on Defendant’s premises while in pursuit of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Russell v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Garner Ex Rel. Estate of Garner v. HouckSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. West v. BuchananAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Quality Towing, Inc. v. City of Myrtle BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Brown v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Holy Loch Distributors, Inc. v. HitchcockCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  5. Blyth v. MarcusCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API