Legal Opinion

City of McAlester v. Nave

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 4, 1969No. 43024PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

The principle issue for decision in this case is whether petitioners, City of Mc-Alester and State Insurance Fund, by their conduct waived objections to the admission in evidence of ex parte statements of claimant’s medical experts and waived cross examination. Our decision rests upon the validity of Rule 12, State Industrial Court Rules promulgated to be effective on January 1, 1966. See Chapter 4, Appendix, 85 O.S.Supp.1968, Page 1580.

Claimant Cecil Roy Nave, respondent herein, was injured on August 18, 1964, while driving a truck for the City of Mc-Alester. Claim was filed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Standard Coal Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Sapulpa Tank Company v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Cotton Coop Ass'n Compress v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  2. Ed Wright Construction Co. v. McKeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. State Highway Department v. ShacklefootSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API