Legal Opinion

Ed Wright Construction Co. v. McKey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 20, 1979No. 51974PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Justice.

The issue for review is whether a trial judge’s refusal to admit the report of petitioners’, Ed Wright Construction Co. and U.S.F.&G. Company (companies), medical examiner into evidence constituted abuse of discretion which prejudiced their rights and denied due process of law.

The claim for compensation filed by Earl McKey (claimant) alleged a back injury occurred February 1, 1977, during covered employment. At the hearing (October 26, 1977) the companies stipulated jurisdictional and evidentiary facts. The case was heard for the determination of permanent partial disability.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Douglas Aircraft CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. Wood v. Oklahoma Osteopathic HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  3. Blue Bell, Inc. v. McKaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  4. 1800 Restaurant, Inc. v. GossettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  5. PALLESEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. WarrenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gaines v. Sun Refinery and MarketingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. Beets v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  3. Harvey v. Auto Plus of WoodwardCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
  4. ARROW TRUCKING CO., INC. v. JimenezCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009
  5. Davis v. Medical Arts LaboratoryCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API