Legal Opinion
Osborne v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided January 25, 1996No. 94CA1788PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge HUME.
Plaintiffs, Corinne and Jack Osborne, individually, and as parents and guardians of Garrett Osborne, appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion for attorney fees and costs. We affirm.
On January 14, 1993, Garrett and his mother, Corinne, were injured in a collision involving their car and a front-end loader. Defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), as plaintiffs’ insurance carrier, paid personal injury protection (PIP) benefits pursuant to Colorado’s No-fault Act. See § 10-4-701, et seq., C.R.S. (1994 Repl.Vol. 4A).
Plaintiffs filed a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- County Workers Compensation Pool v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Moore & Co. v. T-A-L-L, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Knappenberger v. SheaColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Baumgart v. Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Trevino v. HHL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Federal Insurance Co. v. Ferrellgas, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Guiel v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Mitchell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2012
- Thurman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.