Legal Opinion
People v. Kisling
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 28, 2014No. C072497PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NICHOLSON, Acting P. J.
Defendant Richard Kisling appeals from an order of the Sacramento County Superior Court, made after judgment, determining he was not entitled to a hearing on whether his indeterminate commitment as a sexually violent predator violated his equal protection rights, because that issue had been decided adversely to him by People v. McKee (2012) 207 Cal.App.4th 1325 [144 Cal.Rptr.3d 308] (McKee II). We agree that defendant is not entitled to such a hearing and affirm the order.
BACKGROUND
In 2009 a jury found defendant Richard Kisling was a sexually violent predator…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. McKnightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Mountain Air v. Sundowner TowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. Flores CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. Grimes CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.