Legal Opinion

People v. McKnight

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 2012No. A123119PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*862Opinion

SIGGINS, J.

Timothy McKnight challenges his recommitment as a sexually violent predator (SVP) under Welfare and Institutions Code section 6600 et seq.1 (SVPA, or the Act). He contends the Act denies him equal protection of the law because persons committed under it are treated more harshly than MDO’s (mentally disordered offenders) or persons found not guilty by reason of insanity (NGI’s). The recent case of People v. McKee (2012) 207 Cal.App.4th 1325 [144 Cal.Rptr.3d 308] (McKee II) is dispositive of McKnight’s claim. We therefore affirm his recommitment.

BACKGROUND

This case was last…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. People v. FieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. People v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. People v. KislingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. P. v. Glenn CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API