W. W. Sly Mfg. Co. v. Pangborn Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
In Equity. Suit by the W. W. Sly Manufacturing Company against the Pangborn Corporation. On settlement of final decree.
1Opinion of the Court
.ROSE, District Judge.
It has been about 20 months since in this case an opinion was handed down (263 Fed. 394), holding that the patent in suit, No. 710,624, issued October 7, 1902, to William W. Sly, was valid, and that the defendant had infringed its second claim. On the 3d of May, 1920, an accounting was accordingly decreed, but, as the patent had by that time expired, no injunction was granted. On the 3d of June, 1920, the defendant filed the statement required by fhe decree, which showed that the gross sum received from the sale of the infringing device had been quite large, exceeding…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Seabury v. Am EndeSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Gordon v. Turco-Halvah Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Kissinger-Ison Co. v. Bradford Belting Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
- Western Glass Co. v. Schmertz Wire Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
- Oehring v. Fox Typewriter Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Julius Hyman & Co. v. Velsicol Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- USM Corp. v. Marson Fastener Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- LP Larson, Jr., Co. v. William Wrigley, Jr., Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1927
- William Wrigley, Jr. Co. v. L. P. Larson, Jr. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1925
- MacBeth-evans Glass Co. v. L. E. Smith Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.