Legal Opinion
Elliott v. Conagra Brands, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 28, 2025No. 2:23-cv-01417Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LILLIAN ELLIOT, on behalf of herself No. 2:23-cv-01417-DJC-AC and others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER v. 14 CONAGRA BRANDS, INC., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Lillian Elliot regularly used Defendant Conagra Brands, Inc.’s 18 (“Conagra”) butter substitute product sold under the brand name Smart Balance. 19 Plaintiff alleges that Defendant altered the ingredient ratios of its product — Smart 20 Balance Original spread — thereby reducing its quality, without adequately notifying 21 consumers.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Mendiondo v. Centinela Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.