Legal Opinion
Allen v. Lenape Lure Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided April 26, 2002No. 97,084PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
CAROL M. HANSEN, Presiding Judge:
T1 In seeking review of the Workers' Compensation Court's order denying his claim, Petitioner, John Allen (Claimant), contends the court misinterpreted 85 0.8.1991 §§ 65.2 and 65.8, which together are referred to as the "estoppel act." Section 65.2 provides:
Every employer and every insurance carrier who schedules any employee as a person employed by the employer for the purpose of paying or collecting insurance premiums on a Workmen's Compensation insurance policy or who pays, receives or collects any premiums upon any insurance policy covering the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Bank of Tulsa Bldg. v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Fink v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public SafetyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
- Miller v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Phillips v. Duke Manufacturing, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Fuller White Chevrolet Company v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Squirrel v. Bordertown BingoCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
- Davis v. Cherokee Nation EnterprisesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004