Rogers v. Cox
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Henry Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
The complaint of the appellant alleges that he is the owner of the land therein described, and that the appellee wrongfully entered upon it, and without right removed a large frame building.
*158The second paragraph of the answer alleges that the appellee bought the building of the appellant and entered on the land for the purpose of removing the building which he had purchased. A written contract is set forth showing the sale of the building to the .appellee.
'We regard this answer as sufficient. The appellant, having sold to the appellee property of' which possession coaid only bo obtained by an…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Snowden v. WilasIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
- Pea v. PeaIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Buchanan v. Logansport, Crawfordsville & Southwestern R. W. Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Yater v. MullenIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Chambers v. ButcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Binkley v. ForknerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Strosser v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Bomberger v. McKelveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Parish v. KaspareIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Greenwood Lake & Port Jervis Railroad v. New York & Greenwood Lake RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.