Legal Opinion

Merkling v. Ford Motor Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 5, 1937PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdgcomb, J.

This is a negligence action. An automobile owned and driven by the defendant Fick, in which plaintiff was riding as a passenger, collided with a car owned by the defendant Ford Motor Company and driven by the defendant Longanecker, at the intersection of Elk and Hamburg streets in the city of Buffalo. The Ford Motor Company and Longanecker have been held responsible for plaintiff’s resulting injuries. Fick has been exculpated from the charge of negligence.

Without referring to the evidence in detail, we have reached the conclusion that the negligence of the defendants, and the freedom of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Aultman Taylor Co. v. . SymeNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Tennant v. . DudleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Claim of O'Esau v. E. W. Bliss Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  4. Tryon v. WillbankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  5. Reilly v. RawleighAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cogdell v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Bintz v. City of HornellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  3. Foley v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  4. Servido v. Superintendent of InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. Augustine v. Village of InterlakenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API