Legal Opinion

Ermis v. Ermis

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1949PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

In divorce law, adultery is the voluntary sexual intercourse of a married man or woman with a person other than the offender’s wife or husband. State v. Brooks (1934), 215 Wis. 134, 254 N. W. 374.

The rule is that the issue should be determined by the clear and satisfactory preponderance of the evidence. It was stated in Poertner v. Poertner (1886), 66 Wis. 644, 647, 29 N. W. 386:

“We are quite unable to perceive any difference in principle between an issue of adultery in a divorce suit, and issues in many civil actions involving charges of other crimes. The consequences of a finding that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Czerniakowski v. National Ice & Coal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Poertner v. PoertnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  3. State v. BrooksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Gundlach v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Baker v. United StatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1846

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Molloy v. MolloyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Chapman v. ChapmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API