Legal Opinion

Gundlach v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

There is considerable force in the argument of defendant’s counsel that there was not sufficient evidence to establish the guilt of defendant beyond a reasonable doubt. The two principal witnesses for the State were Mr. and Mrs. Martin. The defense produced more than the usual number of character witnesses who swore that the reputation for truth and veracity of these two witnesses was bad and that they would not believe them under oath.

It was an unusual feature of this testimony that one of the character witnesses was the father, two were sisters, and another a brother-in-law of one of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NicholsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. State v. DonovanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  3. State v. HastySupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  4. State v. LloydWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  5. People v. . MunroeNew York Court of Appeals · 1908

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. MeatingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State v. MillsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Teske v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Gutenkunst v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API