Legal Opinion

Gray v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1912No. 16,566PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from tbe district court for Dakota county: Guy T. Graves, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.

This is an action to recover for flood damages to crops in tbe years 1907 and 1908. Tbe petition, mucb condensed, alleges that the defendant’s railway crosses a running stream, known as “Elk Creek,” near plaintiffs’ land; that prior to 1885 Elk Creek in that vicinity spread out forming a marsh, and'finally draining into tbe Missouri river; that tbe drainage of tbe flood-waters was through and over tbe marsh; that in 1885 tbe railway was constructed across tbe marsh and a trestle about 160 rods long built for tbe passage of tbe flood-waters of Elk *797Creek, and that the natural flow of these…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. EmmertNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Morse v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Chicago, Bock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. AndreesenNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. MitchellNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Reed v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnk v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Conley v. HaysNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Wells v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API