Legal Opinion

Strodl v. Farish-Stafford Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided April 15, 1909Published

Motion to vacate and set aside an order for examination of defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtFinelite, J.

This is a motion why an order heretofore granted for an examination of the defendant should not be vacated and set aside. The order was to the effect that the defendant company should submit to an examination and its deposition be taken, pursuant to sections 871, 872, 873 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and that William W. Parish, its president, and William B. Wright, its treasurer and secretary, should appear and submit to an examination concerning facts of certain entries made in the books of the defendant. The plaintiff has instituted an action against the defendant to recover damages for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goldmark v. U. S. Electro-Galvanizing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Istok v. SenderlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API