Legal Opinion
Talcott v. Bailey
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 18, 1926PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohNsoN, J.
The plaintiff is a daughter of Fi’ederick II. Bailey, deceased, 'and one Nan W. Bailey. In April, 1922, the deceased and Nan W. Bailey were divorced, and in September, 1923, he married •the defendant and executrix in this proceeding, Laura Bailey. Frederick H. Bailey, at the time of his death, held two policies of life insurance, the proceeds of which are in issue in this proceeding. The contest is between Laura Bailey, the widow of the insured and executrix of his estate, and the plaintiff, his daughter by his first wife. Both policies are so-called old line policies. One of them, that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- St. John v. . the American Mutual Life Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1855
- Finn v. WalshNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Farmers State Bank v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- Krumenacker v. AndisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- Boyer v. CoughlinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lapland v. StearnsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
- In Re Metcalf's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Jorgensen v. DevineyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- Maher v. Ramsey CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
- Miller v. First National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.