Legal Opinion
Diehsner v. Schenectady City School District
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 6, 1989PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Schenectady County) to review a determination of respondent Schenectady City School District Board of Education which found petitioner guilty of misconduct and terminated his employment.
Petitioner, a utility worker having permanent civil service status in the maintenance department of respondent Schenectady City School District (hereinafter the District), was charged with six instances of employee misconduct in a disciplinary proceeding under Civil Service Law § 75. The six…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People ex rel. Vega v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Eagle v. PatersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- De Carlo v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Hansen v. City of GloversvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Claim of Pugliese v. Remington Arms, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Claim of Russo v. HRT, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Shannon v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Dean v. BradfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. McDormanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.