Legal Opinion
Eagle v. Paterson
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 7, 1982PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
On the record, including the inferences to be derived therefrom, as these unfolded before the hearing officer, it cannot be said as a matter of law that the findings of the *833Secretary of State, including the one that the letters sent to homeowners who had signed “cease and desist requests” constituted “solicitation for listings of the property to which the distribution was made” in violation of 19 NYCRR 175.17 (b), were not supported by substantial evidence. All the more is this so since we no…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Barber v. DembroskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by49 opinions
- People ex rel. Vega v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Gray v. AdduciNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Matherson v. MarchelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Melahn v. HearnNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Burgos v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.