Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Carpenter v. Hammond

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1983No. 6728Published

1ConcurrenceMatthews, Justice

I am in complete agreement with the majority opinion. I write separately to make several observations concerning the conclusion that Cordova may not be included in District 2.

First. The primary error of the reapportionment board was to equate socio-economic integration with socio-economic homogeneity. In the reapportionment plan the board consistently refers to the integration requirement as one of homogeneity.1 The concepts are by no means synonymous. Integration connotes interaction and connectedness, while homogeneity refers to similarity or uniformity. Webster’s Third New International…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Egan v. HammondAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Groh v. EganAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Davenport v. Apportionment CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  4. DAVENPORT v. Apportionment Comm.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  5. Davenport v. Apportionment CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API