Legal Opinion

Conroy v. Haffner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1914No. Docket No. 141PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Shiawassee; Miner, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by Thomas Conroy against George Haffner for money had and received. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

This case originated in justice’s court, and involves a claim of $84. The defendant prevailed in justice’s court, but in the circuit court plaintiff was given a judgment for his claim. The circumstances out of which the controversy arose are as follows: Plaintiff Conroy purchased a stallion for $517.50 at his neighbor Hawley’s auction sale, and gave his note therefor, due in one year. Plaintiff claims that, when he executed the note, Hawley agreed to leave it at the Corunna or Lennon Bank, and at its maturity he could have a renewal, if he desired. A few days before it was due, the Lennon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weaver v. BromleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Caldwell v. BowenMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Collins v. ShawMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Hodges v. Detroit Electric Light & Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Stabler v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reichert v. Negaunee State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API