Weaver v. Bromley
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Oceana. (Russell, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. Tbe facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The plaintiff sued the defendant in justice’s ■court in assumpsit upon a promissory note as follows:
“$50. Hesperia, Michigan, April 28, 1885.
“ Nine months after date I promise to pay to the order of Henry Bromley, or bearer, fifty dollars, at seven per cent, interest. Value received.
“Alphonzo C. Gowell.”
This note was indorsed on the back: “H. Bromley.”
The defendant pleaded the general issue, and filed an affidavit alleging that the note had been altered since he indorsed it, and that he did not sign it as it then appeared. He also denied in said affidavit that he had ever received any notice…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Artman v. FergusonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by15 opinions
- Farrell v. HazeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Battle Creek Food Co. v. KirklandMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Builders Lime & Cement Co. v. WeimerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Collins v. ShawMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Southern Ry. Co. v. Mooresville Cotton MillsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.