Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 11, 1961No. 38553PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Justice.

On November 8, 1956, Ida B. Marshall, plaintiff in error, commenced divorce proceedings against H. G. Marshall, defendant in error, and this appeal involves the ownership of an overriding royalty interest which Ida B. Marshall claims as her separate property. The trial court found that the interest was acquired by the joint industry of Ida B. Marshall and H. G. Marshall, during coverture, and in the Decree of Divorce, entered on July 30, 1958, adjudged and decreed that each receive an undivided one-half interest.

After a motion for new trial was overruled, Ida B. Marshall…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Title Insurance Etc. Co. v. IngersollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Champion v. ChampionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. Marshall v. AmosSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  5. Honeywell v. HoneywellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of HadleyWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  3. Teel v. Public Service Co. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. Teel v. TeelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. Adams v. UnterkircherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API