United States v. Whitley
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
In two separate appeals from criminal convictions, consolidated for disposition, court-appointed defense counsel move to withdraw, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), on the ground that there is no non-frivolous basis for appeal. Because counsel’s Anders briefs fail to address adequately the reasonableness of defendants’ sentences, we deny the motions to withdraw without prejudice to their subsequent renewal, and defer consideration of the government’s motions for summary affirmance until renewed consideration of the motions to withdraw.
Defenda…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Jerome CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. ArguedasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025
- United States v. 777 Greene AvenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- United States v. ElbertCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Rasheem LangleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Montes v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.