Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Virginia Surety Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 26, 1997No. CIV. A. 95-2398 (RCL)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the plaintiffs application and motion for judgment of condemnation on writ of attachment and the garnishee’s motion to quash and/or deny the writ of attachment on judgment.
Rule 69 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorizes proceedings in aid of judgment and execution “in accordance with the practice and procedure of the state in which the district court is held.” D.C.Code § 16-556 and Superior Court Civil Rule 69-Re) permit a “Judgment of Condemnation” enforcing a garnishment writ when supported by an…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Gus S. Mijalis, and Gus S. MijalisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Chacon v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Catholic Diocese of Dodge City v. RaymerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. BurdetteDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1989
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Globe Indemnity Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Lionel Vincent CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Daniel v. American Board of Emergency MedicineDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2002
- GT Solar v. GoiDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
- ATX Debt Fund 1, LLC v. PaulDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- FDIC v. InterdonatoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.