Legal Opinion
ATX Debt Fund 1, LLC v. Paul
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 29, 2024No. 1:19-cv-08540Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ATX DEBT FUND 1, LLC, Plaintiff, 19-CV-8540 (JPO) -v- OPINION AND ORDER NATIN PAUL, also known as Nate Paul, Defendant. J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: Plaintiff ATX Debt Fund 1, LLC (“ATX”) maintains this action against Defendant Natin Paul (“Paul”) for breach of a loan guaranty that he signed. ATX now moves for summary judgment against Paul and seeks enforcement of the terms of that guaranty. For the reasons that follow, ATX’s motion for summary judgment is granted. I. Background A. Factual Background The following facts are drawn…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kwan v. The Andalex Group LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Fujitsu Limited v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.