Legal Opinion
Martin v. Monsanto Company
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided September 17, 1975No. 2-473A84PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CASE SUMMARY
Buchanan, J.
Plaintiff-Appellant, Harold D. Martin (Martin), seeks review of a negative Award entered by the Full Industrial Board of Indiana (the Board) denying compensation for back injuries sustained while in the employ of Defendant-Appellee Monsanto Company (Monsanto), claiming the Findings of Fact were not specific enough for intelligent review, the Award is contrary to law, and the Board erroneously admitted two pieces of evidence.
We affirm.
CASE HISTORY
Upon initial consideration of this case on February 12, 1975, we found the Findings of Fact originally entered by the Board…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Eugene M. Fuhrer v. Malcolm W. FuhrerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
- Carlton v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
- Russell v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
- Nisbet v. Van TuylCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- Transport Motor Express, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Duncan v. George Moser Leather Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Dennison v. Martin, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Rundel v. ShadyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Anton v. Anton Interiors, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Wilson v. Chevrolet Commercial BodyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.