Legal Opinion

Romero v. City of Pomona

District Court, C.D. California

Decided July 20, 1987No. CV 85-3359 JMI (Gx)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IDEMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court following a nonjury trial held on June 17, 1986 to June 24,1986. After the close of plaintiffs’ case-in-chief, the defendants moved to dismiss the action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Court directed the parties to submit briefs addressing the factual and legal issues raised. The briefs have been received and oral argument was heard thereafter. The matter is now ripe for decision.

The plaintiffs in this action are five his-panic and black residents of the City of Pomona, California. The defendants are the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Frank McNeil Individually and as Representatives of a Certified Class v. Springfield Park District and Springfield School District No. 186, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. New York v. U.S. Dep't of CommerceDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  3. Romero v. City of PomonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Romero v. City Of PomonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. In Re Proportionality Review Project (II)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API