Legal Opinion
Hill v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DOES
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 17, 1998No. 97-AA-273PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
717 A.2d 909 (1998)
Edward C. HILL, Jr., Petitioner,
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, Respondent.
Greyhound Lines, Inc., Intervenor.
No. 97-AA-273.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Submitted January 28, 1998.
Decided September 17, 1998.
Edward C. Hill, filed a brief pro se.
Stephen P. Zachary, Washington, DC, was on the brief for intervenor.
Jo Anne Robinson, Interim Corporation Counsel, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corporation Counsel, filed a statement in lieu of brief for respondent.
Before TERRY and FARRELL, Associate Judges, and KING, Associate Judge, Retired.[*]
TER…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hughes v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Glenbrook Road Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- District of Columbia v. PattersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
3Cited by17 opinions
- Clark v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Watergate East Committee Against Hotel Conversion to Co-Op Apartments v. District of Columbia Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Orius Telecommunications, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Harris v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Hensley v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.